The Alex Murdaugh trial, one of the most high-profile legal battles in recent South Carolina history, continues to be shrouded in controversy, with explosive allegations surfacing against Becky Hill, the Colleton County Clerk of Court. Becky Hill, who played a significant role during the trial, now faces a barrage of accusations that could undermine the entire judicial process.

Table of Contents

Allegations Against Becky Hill: Jury Tampering and Ethical Violations

Becky Hill has been accused of tampering with the jury, an accusation that strikes at the heart of the justice system’s integrity. Allegations include that Hill deliberately targeted Myra Crosby, then known only as Juror 785, due to Crosby’s perceived reluctance to convict Alex Murdaugh. Reports suggest that Hill had direct conversations with Myra Crosby, questioning her leanings in the case—a breach of ethical conduct. Shortly after these interactions, Crosby was removed from the jury, raising red flags about the impartiality of the process. The removal was, allegedly, the culmination of a campaign of intimidation that included an anonymous email from Christine Avery, a known associate of Hill and a member of the Luna Shark community, sent the very week Crosby was dismissed.

Connections and Possible Conflicts of Interest: Becky Hill’s Circle

The layers of personal connections surrounding Becky Hill further complicate the narrative. Hill was reportedly friends with the jury foreperson, creating a conflict of interest. Additionally, Hill maintained a close relationship with Christine Avery, the same individual who sent the anonymous email implicating Crosby. Avery has been publicly acknowledged for her involvement with Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell, and attorney Mark Tinsley, who have been vocal critics of Alex Murdaugh and instrumental in publicizing the case. This network of relationships casts doubt on Hill’s ability to remain impartial and raises serious ethical concerns about her conduct during the trial. Add in the fact that Eric Bland, attorney and podcast member with Luna Shark, had self-publicized texts and early morning conversations with state prosecutor, Creighton Waters.

Is it possible Christine Avery was heavily guided and influenced in what to do, say, and to whom and where to send something about Crosby? If so, by whom?

Both Tinsley and Bland had huge potential financial gains at stake with a Murdaugh guilty verdict. As of recent reports, Eric Bland, along with his law firm, Bland Richter, has helped recover approximately $7.5 million related to the settlement of lawsuits involving Alex Murdaugh’s former law firm clients and other victims, such as the family of Gloria Satterfield, Murdaugh’s former housekeeper who died in a suspicious accident. If a contingency fee was negotiated, Bland and Co reaped nearly a whopping $2.5 million dollars from these cases.

Mark Tinsley, the attorney representing the family of Mallory Beach, who tragically died in the 2019 boat crash involving Paul Murdaugh, has played a crucial role in seeking financial compensation for the victims of that incident. As of recent reports, Tinsley has secured a settlement amounting to approximately $15 million for the Beach family. If a contingency fee was negotiated, Tinsley and Co reaped nearly a whopping $5 million dollars from this case.

Legal and Ethical Violations: A Pattern of Misconduct

Beyond the jury tampering allegations, Becky Hill faces accusations of nearly 70 ethical violations filed by the South Carolina Ethics Committee. These include potential misuse of funds, which is now under investigation by the 11th Circuit Solicitor’s Office. The accusations against Hill don’t end there. In a scandal that only adds to the cloud of suspicion, Hill’s son was arrested for wiretapping, further highlighting the troubling environment surrounding her office.

Jurors’ Note-Taking and Potential Breaches of Confidentiality

During the trial, jurors were permitted to take notes, but these notes had to remain in the jury room. This practice, intended to maintain the sanctity of deliberations, has now come under scrutiny. Given the extensive accusations against Hill, it raises the question: who’s to say someone at the Colleton County Courthouse didn’t access these juror notes? Based on reports, investigations, and ethics committee hearings planned, is possible breaching the privacy of jurors’ notes beyond the realm of possibility?

A Known Holdout: The Spotlight on Myra Crosby

It was widely speculated among attorneys and reporters covering the trial that Juror 785, Myra Crosby, would be a lone holdout. This was not an apparrent secret—many believed that Crosby harbored doubts about Murdaugh’s guilt. The question of how Becky Hill could have known Crosby’s thoughts is moot to those familiar with the trial’s inner workings. Hill’s close relationships, the anonymous email, and alleged direct questioning of Crosby paint a clear picture of how she might have known. Suggesting otherwise is to ignore the glaring evidence and testimonies that have come to light.

Conclusion: Seeking the Truth in a Web of Deceit

The Murdaugh trial’s credibility is now under siege, not by the actions of Alex Murdaugh, but by the very institution tasked with upholding justice. Becky Hill’s alleged actions, along with the web of personal and professional relationships entwined with the case, demand a thorough and transparent investigation. The unanswered questions and lack of accountability point to a system that may have failed Kaden Thomas-Lee Moses and others seeking justice.

At Crime and Cask, we are committed to uncovering the truth. As this investigation unfolds, we will continue to ask the tough questions and pursue the facts, no matter where they lead. The community, the legal system, and the family of Kaden Thomas-Lee Moses deserve answers.

Stay tuned for more updates and investigative reports as we continue to follow this story closely. All assertions herein are allegations and everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.