
Retrial Set for Former Banker Russell Laffitte Amid Allegations of Conspiring with Alex Murdaugh
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Former Hampton banker Russell Laffitte is set to face a new trial on May 5, 2025, after a federal appeals court overturned his convictions for conspiracy, bank fraud, wire fraud, and misapplication of bank funds. The retrial stems from procedural errors during Laffitte’s 2022 trial, U.S. Attorney Adair Ford Boroughs confirmed this week.
Appeals Court Decision
In November 2024, the U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that U.S. District Judge Richard Gergel violated Laffitte’s Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury. The court found:
- Juror Mismanagement: During jury deliberations, Judge Gergel dismissed and replaced a juror experiencing anxiety after a private, in-chambers conversation. The reconstituted jury delivered a guilty verdict within an hour, raising concerns about the fairness of the proceedings.
- Fifth Amendment Violation: Laffitte was not present during discussions about the juror replacement, further undermining the integrity of the trial.
The court vacated Laffitte’s convictions, ordering a new trial. The errors did not involve the facts of the case, which prosecutors have described as strong.
The Case Against Laffitte
Laffitte, the former CEO of Hampton-based Palmetto State Bank, was convicted in November 2022 on six federal counts, including conspiracy and misapplication of bank funds. Prosecutors alleged that Laffitte used his position at the bank to funnel money from Alex Murdaugh’s legal clients to pay off Murdaugh’s debts and fund his schemes.
The investigation into Laffitte’s actions arose as authorities probed Murdaugh’s sprawling web of financial and criminal activity following the 2021 murders of his wife, Maggie, and son, Paul, at the family’s Colleton County hunting lodge. Murdaugh is currently serving life in prison for the killings.
Federal Retrial Scheduled
Veronica Hill, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Carolina, confirmed the retrial date. Federal prosecutors, led by U.S. Attorney Adair Ford Boroughs, have vowed to pursue the case vigorously. “This retrial is essential to ensuring justice is served,” Boroughs said, noting that the appeals court’s decision was procedural and not related to the evidence presented.
The retrial will likely revisit key allegations, including how Laffitte allegedly exploited his executive position to benefit Murdaugh at the expense of vulnerable clients.
Can Laffitte Ask for a Continuance?
A continuance is a formal request to delay a scheduled trial. It can be requested by either the defense or the prosecution. Laffitte’s legal team might file a motion for a continuance if they believe more time is needed to prepare their case. May 5th, 2025 is just 108 days from today.
Common Reasons for Requesting a Continuance
- Insufficient Preparation Time:
- If the defense requires additional time to review evidence, interview witnesses, or prepare legal arguments, they can argue that proceeding as scheduled would violate Laffitte’s right to a fair trial.
- New Evidence:
- The emergence of new evidence or witnesses may justify a delay to allow proper investigation and incorporation into the case strategy.
- Scheduling Conflicts:
- Conflicts with attorneys, witnesses, or experts could be cited as reasons to request a postponement.
- Health Issues:
- If Laffitte or key members of his defense team have health problems that could impair their participation, a continuance might be requested.
- Strategic Delays:
- While courts discourage delays for purely strategic reasons, Laffitte’s legal team might argue that a delay is necessary to address procedural or legal concerns.
How the Court Decides
The judge will weigh several factors in deciding whether to grant a continuance:
- Reasonableness of the Request:
- Is the request legitimate and based on unavoidable circumstances?
- Impact on Justice:
- Will denying the continuance compromise the fairness of the trial?
- Impact on the Prosecution:
- Will the delay unduly prejudice the prosecution’s case or harm public interest?
- History of Delays:
- If Laffitte or his team have requested multiple continuances in the past, the court may view additional requests skeptically.
- Trial Schedule:
- Courts must balance the request with their obligations to manage an efficient docket.
Potential Opposition from the Prosecution
In high-profile cases like Russell Laffitte’s, prosecutors may oppose a continuance, especially if they believe it is a delay tactic. In this instance, U.S. Attorney Adair Ford Boroughs has already indicated the prosecution is prepared to move forward, which may lead them to resist any attempts to postpone the trial. There is the possibility taht Boroughs may also be asked to resign before the trial by incoming U.S. Attorney General, Pam Bondi. Or Bondi may not want to pursue a trial with Laffitte.
Likelihood of Success
The success of a continuance request depends on the specific circumstances Russell Laffitte’s legal team can present. If they demonstrate a genuine need that outweighs any inconvenience to the court or prosecution, the judge may grant the motion. However, any perceived attempt to prolong the process unnecessarily might lead to a denial.
State Charges Add to Laffitte’s Legal Troubles
While Russell Laffitte prepares for his federal retrial, he also faces 21 state charges related to alleged schemes to defraud victims of more than $1.8 million. South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson’s office had a status conference on December 9, 2024, at the Orangeburg County Courthouse. Judge Heath Taylor, who now oversees all Murdaugh-related cases, will preside.
State prosecutor Creighton Waters is expected to outline the timeline for Laffitte’s state trial. These charges accuse Laffitte of playing a central role in helping Murdaugh siphon millions from legal clients, friends, and family members.
Broader Implications for South Carolina’s Legal System
Laffitte’s case highlights significant challenges within South Carolina’s judicial system, including concerns over transparency and procedural fairness:
- Judicial Accountability: The procedural errors in Laffitte’s federal trial have drawn scrutiny of Judge Gergel’s handling of the case. Legal observers question whether such errors reflect deeper issues within the court system.
- Public Skepticism: The decision to seal some records related to Alex Murdaugh’s murder trial—including the controversial removal of Juror 785—has fueled ongoing distrust in the state’s legal institutions.
What’s Next?
Russell Laffitte’s retrial introduces significant legal and procedural complexities. The outcome of his federal case will likely influence how his state charges are pursued. Meanwhile, the broader implications of his case continue to resonate, raising questions about South Carolina’s judicial process and the administration of justice in high-profile cases.
Stay tuned to CC News Network for updates on this developing story.
Connect with CC News Network:
Stay updated with CC News Network’s latest investigations, book releases, and appearances by following him on social media. Join the growing community of readers and true crime enthusiasts who trust James Seidel for his insightful analysis and gripping storytelling.
Over 1,200,000 Million likes of Tiktok alone!
Join Our Close to 100,000 Social Media Fans:
- X: @CCNewsNetwork
- TikTok: @CCNewsNetwork
- Facebook: CC News Network
- Talk Radio: 97.7FM WVFF – airs in the Low Country
- Amazon Books: Click here to follow
- Cameo: @CC News Network
- Spotify: @CC Records