
South Carolina Doctors Challenge State Abortion Ban in Federal Court
COLUMBIA, S.C. — A group of five South Carolina physicians are set to challenge the state’s abortion ban and have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the state’s recently enacted abortion restrictions, arguing that the ban violates both constitutional and religious freedoms. The lawsuit, filed in Charleston’s U.S. District Court, names South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson and members of the South Carolina Board of Medical Examiners as defendants.
At the heart of the legal challenge is South Carolina’s abortion law, enacted in May 2023, which prohibits most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, with narrow exceptions for rape, incest, fatal fetal anomalies, and threats to the mother’s life. Violations of the law carry severe criminal penalties, including up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine. Physicians performing abortions under the law’s exceptions are required to document specific details and report cases to state authorities, further complicating medical care.
Physicians Cite Religious and Ethical Obligations
The plaintiffs, all board-certified OB-GYNs, contend that the abortion ban infringes upon their deeply held religious beliefs and professional ethics. Dr. Natalie Dawn Bingham, one of the lead plaintiffs, asserts that her faith commands her to respect others’ autonomy and alleviate suffering, values she feels are directly contradicted by the current law. Dr. Bingham, a practicing Christian and elder in her church, explained that her medical practice has always been informed by her faith’s call to compassion and justice.
“South Carolina’s law forces us to choose between our religious convictions and the threat of imprisonment,” Bingham said in a statement. “We cannot, in good conscience, abandon patients in their time of need.”
Legal Arguments Against the Ban
The physicians’ lawsuit argues that South Carolina’s abortion law is unconstitutionally vague and selectively burdens those with religious objections. They seek relief under the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Specifically, the doctors point to the ambiguity in the law’s exceptions for health risks and fatal fetal anomalies, which they say leave medical professionals unclear on when they can legally provide care.
According to the lawsuit, the law’s health exception permits abortions only when necessary to prevent “serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,” a phrase that lacks a clear medical definition. Similarly, the fatal fetal anomaly exception applies only when a fetus is deemed “incompatible with sustaining life after birth,” a standard the plaintiffs argue is both vague and difficult to determine in practice.
Broader Implications for Medical Care in South Carolina
Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization overturned federal abortion protections in 2022, South Carolina has been at the forefront of legal battles over reproductive rights. The state initially enacted a six-week ban in 2021, which was struck down by the South Carolina Supreme Court. However, a revised version of the law was passed in 2023 and upheld by the court later that year.
The plaintiffs warn that the current law has created a chilling effect on medical care, with physicians afraid to perform even legally permitted abortions due to fear of prosecution. They cite cases where women with severe health complications were denied timely care, resulting in prolonged suffering and increased medical risks.
“By forcing doctors to navigate unclear legal standards under threat of criminal penalties, this law puts both patients and healthcare providers in an impossible position,” said co-plaintiff Dr. Jessica Tarleton. “We’ve seen cases where patients had to leave the state to receive necessary care, which is both dangerous and unjust.”
A Growing National Debate
The lawsuit highlights a broader national debate over the intersection of reproductive rights and religious freedom. While many states have moved to restrict access to abortion following the Dobbs decision, legal challenges like this one are testing the limits of those laws under federal constitutional principles.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications not only for South Carolina but also for other states with similarly restrictive abortion laws. As the legal battle unfolds, both sides are bracing for a potentially lengthy court fight.
For now, the plaintiffs hope their lawsuit will bring attention to the real-world consequences of South Carolina’s abortion ban and ultimately lead to greater clarity and fairness in the law.
Connect with CC News Network
Over 1,400,000 Million likes of Tiktok alone!
Join Our Close to 100,000 Social Media Fans:
- X: @CCNewsNetwork
- TikTok: @CCNewsNetwork
- Facebook: CC News Network
- Talk Radio: 97.7FM WVFF – airs in the Low Country
- Amazon Books: Click here to follow
- Cameo: @CC News Network
- Spotify: @CC Records
- Bluesky: @ccnewsnetwork.bsky.social
- Mastadon: @CrimeandCask
- Unnamed Network: New True Crime Drama Series