Formally known as Juror 785 or the infamous “egg lady,” Myra Crosby has stepped into the public eye following the Alex Murdaugh trial, determined to clear her name and expose what she believes was a scheme to wrongfully remove her from the jury. In her new book, Because Enough is Enough, Crosby outlines her side of the story, alleging that she was ousted due to jury tampering orchestrated by Rebecca Hill and others who assumed she would cast a “not guilty” vote.
Clearing Her Name
Crosby wrote Because Enough is Enough as a response to the relentless defamation she has faced since her removal from the Murdaugh jury. Critics have labeled her a liar, mocked her as the “egg lady,” and even created songs deriding her. They’ve falsely accused her of violating her oath and discussing the trial while serving as a juror, ultimately leading to her dismissal. Judge Newman, however, had praised her as an excellent juror before her removal, which adds more confusion to her critics’ claims. Crosby’s book aims to set the record straight, using what she describes as factual evidence to counter the lies that have been spread about her.
Yet, criticism has not waned. Despite the public not having access to her book yet, some individuals and groups are already calling it not credible. The loudest voices belong to a fervent anti-Murdaugh faction known as Luna Shark, owned by Mandy Matney and her husband, David Moses. Luna Shark’s associates, including Matney’s partners Liz Farrell, attorney Eric Bland, and attorney Mark Tinsley, have echoed these sentiments, arguing that they’re simply repeating what’s in the court records. But Crosby disputes this, claiming that the real court records of her removal were sealed by Judge Newman to protect her anonymity. Now that Crosby has come forward, she’s demanding those records be released for full transparency, hoping this will vindicate her and reveal the truth behind her dismissal.
Sealed Records and Legal Battle
Crosby’s attorney, Joe McCulloch, filed a motion to unseal records related to her removal, arguing that these documents, initially sealed to protect juror confidentiality, should be accessible to the public. The South Carolina Attorney General’s office, however, has refused to release them, citing unspecified “ongoing issues.” This secrecy has only fueled Crosby’s resolve, as it is believed that these records could show that the accusations against her were fabricated and that her removal was unjustified.
This refusal raises significant questions: Why are these records, which have a direct bearing on the jury’s decision in the Murdaugh trial, still under wraps? What is being hidden? The defense and the juror herself have agreed to the unsealing, yet the prosecution holds back, prompting suspicion and speculation. These records could potentially shed light on the motivations behind Crosby’s dismissal and reveal whether there was any undue influence exerted by external parties.
Connecting the Dots: Allegations of Tampering and Collusion
Adding to the intrigue, it was Luna Shark who allegedly doxed the jurors early in the trial, including Crosby, labeling her occupation as “Monkey farm” in a publicly posted spreadsheet. This term resurfaced in an anonymous email sent to Judge Newman by Christine Avery, a Luna Shark associate of their Discord, falsely claiming that Crosby was discussing the case openly. Avery’s acknowledgment of sending this email—and her subsequent expressions of gratitude to Luna Shark and Tinsley for their guidance—suggest to many of an alleged coordinated effort to possibly influence the trial’s outcome and to remove Crosby, who was suspected of being a holdout against a guilty verdict.
Crosby recounts how, after a baseless Facebook post by a man claiming his ex-wife was on the Murdaugh jury and discussing the case, she was repeatedly grilled by Clerk of Court Becky Hill about her views on Murdaugh’s guilt. Hill allegedly pressured Crosby, suggesting that she should vote guilty, effectively breaking her down while pretending to be her protector. Crosby felt that Hill’s questioning and behavior were attempts to manipulate her stance on the verdict. This alleged manipulation, combined with the alleged false accusations spread by Luna Shark and Avery, set the stage for Crosby’s dismissal from the jury.
Luna Shark’s Role and Financial Interests
Luna Shark’s involvement extends beyond just public commentary. Bland and Tinsley, both connected to Luna Shark, were in communication with the prosecution during the trial and stood to possibly gain financially from a guilty verdict. Tinsley and Bland eventually secured over $20 million for their clients from settlements related to the Murdaugh family’s legal issues. This connection raises possible questions about their motivations and actions. Were their public statements and private communications designed to allegedly protect their financial interests by ensuring a guilty verdict?
Eric Bland on Luna Shark’s Cop of Justice
Mandy Matney capitalized on the case’s notoriety by writing a book, Murder, Corruption, and the Fall of the Murdaugh Dynasty. The book, detailing the downfall of the Murdaugh family, relied heavily on the public perception of Alex Murdaugh’s guilt. Had the trial resulted in a hung jury or a not-guilty verdict, it’s possible that Matney’s book—and the Luna Shark brand—might not have achieved the same level of success. These financial stakes call into question the objectivity of Luna Shark’s reporting and their alleged motivations behind attacking Crosby.
Allegations of Coordinated Smear Campaign
The narrative built by Luna Shark and its associates around Crosby appears to be part of a larger coordinated effort to discredit her and the book. According to Crosby, Christine Avery’s anonymous email and public statements reveal a network of communication and strategy designed to allegedly manipulate the trial’s outcome. Avery openly thanked Luna Shark, Mark Tinsley, and others for their support and guidance, suggesting a level of collaboration that goes beyond mere commentary online.
Crosby’s allegations extend to direct quotes and public statements made by Eric Bland and Mark Tinsley. Bland, in a YouTube video, acknowledged knowing about the anonymous email, while Tinsley commented online about Crosby’s alleged violations of the judge’s orders, perpetuating the narrative of her guilt without evidence. These public statements and the timing of Avery’s comments could be viewed by some that Luna Shark’s members and associates were allegedly actively involved in a campaign to remove Crosby from the jury because she may vote not guilty and discredit her publicly after.
A Call for Truth
Despite Luna Shark’s preemptive dismissal of her book, Crosby is resolute. She calls for the release of all records related to her removal, suggesting that these documents would further exonerate her and reveal the truth behind the state’s narrative. Crosby’s push for transparency is her way of combating what she sees as a deliberate smear campaign designed to ruin her reputation and book and ensure a guilty verdict in the Murdaugh trial.
In a conversation with Crime and Cask, Crosby proposed a bold solution: a polygraph test. She’s willing to take one regarding her interactions with the tenants, the anonymous email, and the Facebook post if Tinsley, Bland, Matney, Farrell, Beth Braden, and David Moses also submit to polygraphs concerning their involvement and knowledge about her removal. Christine Avery and Becky Hill are also invited to participate.
Starting around January 2023, during the Murdaugh trial, Christine Avery was in Discord overload. We have ascertained over 50+ Discord messages from Avery about Murdaugh, the egg lady, Dick Harpootlian, and more. She ramps it up around February and March when her anonymous email was sent according to her. Below are Discord messages from Avery to the group. She’s clearly anti-Murdaugh to be a large part of this group.
Crosby’s offer is straightforward: she is ready to clear her name and put the accusations to rest once and for all. Now, she’s asking if Luna Shark and their associates are willing to do the same. Her challenge underscores the central theme of her book and her public fight—enough is enough. She demands accountability, transparency, and truth, challenging her accusers to face the same scrutiny they have subjected her to. Will they?
Crosby believes if anyone was involved in a scheme to have her removed based on fake Facebook posts and nefarious anonymous emails, could be subject to possible charges of obstruction of justice, Defamation and False Statements, Perjury and Suborning Perjury, Conspiracy, and Violation of Ethical Standards.
The case of Myra Crosby, once known as the “egg lady,” now stands as a symbol of the ongoing battle over truth and justice in the aftermath of the Alex Murdaugh trial. As Crosby’s story continues to unfold, the questions about her removal and the alleged tampering behind it may yet reveal deeper, systemic issues within the South Carolina judicial process. Until then, Crosby remains steadfast in her quest to clear her name and expose what she views as a miscarriage of justice.
