The intertwined legal troubles of Becky Hill, the former Clerk of Court for Colleton County, and her son Jeffrey “Colt” Hill have gripped South Carolina’s justice system, especially in the wake of the Alex Murdaugh trial. With multiple investigations and allegations surfacing about obstruction of justice, wiretapping, and ethical violations, both Hill and her son are under intense scrutiny. Yet, nearly a year later, the investigations seem to be dragging on, leaving many to wonder: what’s taking so long?
Where Are the Investigations Now?
Becky Hill, who gained national attention for her role in the Alex Murdaugh trial, faces multiple allegations of jury tampering and fund misuse. The jury tampering allegations stem from claims made by Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian, Murdaugh’s defense attorneys, who assert that Hill improperly influenced jurors during the trial to ensure a conviction. They allege that she had private conversations with jurors, told them not to be swayed by Murdaugh’s testimony, and removed a juror she thought might vote for acquittal.
At the same time, Hill is facing close to 100 ethics charges for alleged misuse of public funds during her tenure as Clerk of Court. These charges are being handled by the South Carolina Ethics Commission, with an investigation being conducted by the 11th Circuit Solicitor’s Office. The fact that these investigations are still ongoing has raised questions about the pace of justice.
Hill’s son, Jeffrey “Colt” Hill, was arrested in November 2023 on charges of wiretapping. According to SLED (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division), he intercepted and recorded phone conversations involving Meagan Utsey, Colleton County’s deputy administrator. This wiretapping incident is suspected to be part of a larger effort to keep Becky Hill informed about the ongoing investigations into her own conduct.
What makes the case even murkier is that both Jeffrey and Becky Hill allegedly tampered with the evidence. Becky Hill’s iPhone, which she surrendered to SLED, was wiped clean, reset to its factory settings. Additionally, multiple phones linked to Jeffrey Hill, including his Samsung devices, were also reset or destroyed. This raises the question of obstruction of justice: Did the Hill duo knowingly destroy or hide key evidence?
Why Is It Taking So Long?
The delays in these investigations are puzzling. Some of these inquiries, particularly those surrounding Becky Hill’s jury tampering during the Murdaugh trial, are almost a year old. With so much attention on these high-profile cases, one would expect a more timely resolution. The public is left wondering whether the state is deliberately stalling, perhaps to prevent Murdaugh from receiving a new trial based on these allegations.
Moreover, there is a distinct lack of transparency from the Attorney General’s Office and SLED. As noted by Myra Crosby, better known as Juror 785 or the Egg Lady, there are unsettling gaps in the public information surrounding this case. In a recent interview, Crosby asked, “What wiretapping did her son Colt Hill really do according to SLED? Was the Jury room bugged? Could Becky have known what every Juror was saying in private?” These questions strike at the heart of the matter: if the jury was compromised, Murdaugh’s conviction could be overturned. But what if the state is withholding key information to prevent that from happening?
The fact that Becky Hill’s case and the wiretapping investigation are so closely intertwined adds to the complexity. If the state is found to be obstructing justice by dragging its feet on releasing information, it raises serious constitutional questions. Could this delay be a deliberate attempt to avoid giving Murdaugh grounds for a retrial?
The Jury Tampering Allegations and the Murdaugh Trial
The Alex Murdaugh trial was one of the most-watched cases in recent American legal history. The disgraced attorney was convicted of murdering his wife and son, and the trial became a media spectacle. Becky Hill, in her role as Clerk of Court, was in charge of the jury. In their appeal, Murdaugh’s defense alleges that Hill tampered with the jury for personal gain, specifically to land a book deal and gain media attention.
These allegations were bolstered by affidavits from jurors who claimed Hill had inappropriate interactions with them, including suggesting they reach a quick verdict. Hill’s book, Behind the Doors of Justice: The Murdaugh Murders, was published just months after the trial, fueling speculation that she stood to gain from a guilty verdict.

The State’s Role in Withholding Information
There is also the matter of Myra Crosby’s records. The state has repeatedly refused to release public information about Crosby, a key juror in the Murdaugh trial. Despite multiple requests, the South Carolina Supreme Court is now being asked to intervene to compel the release of these records. This raises another critical question: Is the state intentionally withholding information that could prove damaging to its case?
Is the State Obstructing Justice?
With so many unanswered questions, it’s hard to ignore the possibility that the state might be obstructing justice. If Becky Hill and her son Colt are guilty of tampering with evidence and influencing the Murdaugh jury, the implications are staggering. And if the state is deliberately withholding information or dragging its feet on the investigation to prevent Murdaugh from receiving a new trial, that could itself constitute an obstruction of justice.
In this case, if state actors were found to be deliberately withholding critical information that could affect the outcome of a trial or appeal, it could indeed be considered obstruction of justice. The intent behind the actions is key: if it can be proven that the state’s actions were motivated by a desire to prevent the discovery of truth or the fair administration of justice, then it could lead to serious legal consequences.
Conclusion: Legal Precedents and Consequences
Both federal and state laws govern obstruction of justice. In South Carolina, obstructing justice could result in both criminal charges and potential civil penalties, especially if it can be demonstrated that a fair legal process was compromised intentionally.
If the Alex Murdaugh case and the investigations into Becky Hill and Colt Hill are intentionally being delayed or manipulated to prevent a new trial, legal experts might argue that such actions fall under obstruction.
It’s also important to note that obstruction charges against public officials can trigger independent investigations, potentially leading to criminal prosecution for the individuals involved. In this context, Myra Crosby’s and Jim Griffin’s claims about delays and withheld information could provide grounds for such allegations if proven true.
As we wait for more details to emerge, it’s crucial to keep asking the hard questions: Who is protecting whom? What evidence is being hidden? And most importantly, how will justice be served?
Crime and Cask News will continue to follow the developments in the Becky Hill and Colt Hill investigations, ensuring that the public stays informed and justice prevails.