Scrutinizing Justice: Why We Challenged Murdaugh's Verdict and What it Means for Us All

Scrutinizing Justice: Why We Challenged Murdaugh's Verdict and What it Means for Us All

The Alex Murdaugh saga has captivated the nation. But beyond the sensational details lie fundamental questions about justice, transparency, and the integrity of our legal system in South Carolina. This is why Crime and Cask Media has delved deeply into the allegations of jury tampering against clerk of court Becky Hill, despite Murdaugh's character.

This isn't about defending Murdaugh; it's about defending a core principle: the right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. This right, enshrined in the Constitution, transcends personalities and cases.

Evidence and Doubts

Our concern stems from very credible evidence presented during the recent hearing. Three jurors testified to Hill's alleged improper interactions, potentially influencing their verdict. The state's "star witness," Hill herself, provided contradictory and demonstrably false testimony, raising serious concerns about her credibility. Judge Toal said that Hill’s testimony was not credible and that she was “attracted by the siren call of celebrity,” saying that Hill expressed a desire to write a book about the trial even before it was said to begin.

Despite this compelling evidence, the judge denied a new trial. This begs the question: was justice served, or was a predetermined outcome prioritized? Because Justice Toal's statement read just less than 20 minutes after she adjourned seemed prewritten by someone else, as the text itself could not have been written in that amount of time. 

Crime and Cask

Image by Post and Courier


Transparency and Fairness

While we disagree with the verdict, we commend the judge's transparency in conducting an open hearing. However, concerns remain. The high burden of proof placed on the defense, limited juror testimony, and potential juror misconduct in the deliberation room cast a large shadow on the entire Murdaugh trial and process.

Furthermore, the deeply conflicted involvement of the Attorney General's office and SLED in Hill's "investigation" raises unsettling questions about their impartiality and commitment to a thorough investigation. This same group of prosecutors are actively investigating Hill for jury tampering. So why defend Hill on the stand against jury tampering? To save money on a new trial where Murdaugh can receive a fair trial? The price, whatever it would be, will seem low compared to putting a man in prison knowing that a juror changed her verdict because of pressure placed upon her by a member of the State. What cost is too high to protect the 6th Amendment? 

Beyond Murdaugh: Protecting Liberty

Moving beyond Murdaugh, this case exposes broader issues within South Carolina's legal system. The alleged collusion to manipulate the jury reflects a troubling pattern of potential institutional bias. This is why we must continue scrutinizing and demanding accountability, regardless of individual figures.

Angels and Devils: Unveiling the System's Flaws

The Murdaugh saga has revealed "angels and devils," but also exposed the vulnerabilities within the justice system itself. The system, once exploited by Murdaugh, now seems bent on self-preservation, potentially at the expense of upholding fundamental principles.

Crime and Cask

Is this working? Appearances are often deceiving" In William Shakespeare's As You Like It (Act III, Scene II), our fellow writer Bill Shakespeare is saying not all who appear righteous are truly just. This case demands continued scrutiny to ensure justice prevails, not just for Murdaugh, but for the integrity of our legal system and the rights of every citizen of South Carolina.

Back to blog